© 2022 Copyright Statement dolor sit amet, consetetur sadipscing User Terms, sed diam nonumy eirmod tempor invidunt ut labore et dolore magna aliquyam erat, sed diam voluptua. At vero eos et accusam et justo duo dolores et ea rebum. Stet clita kasd gubergren, no sea takimata sanctus est Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet.
You need to be logged in to fill out this form
"*" indicates required fields
Ration Balancer vs. Vitamin and Mineral Supplements
Q. My horse eats grass hay and doesn’t need additional calories. I know I need to add a source of minerals and vitamins to balance the ration. Why do ration balancing feeds have 1-2-pound serving sizes while most of the supplements have 3-6-ounce serving sizes? Why are they so different?
A. Ration balancing feeds and vitamin mineral supplements designed to balance rations might appear similar. For example, ration balancing feeds often have a zinc content of between 400 and 600 ppm (milligrams per kilogram), so if feeding 2 pounds per day you would be feeding slightly less than 400 to 600 milligrams. The vitamin and mineral supplements that claim to support a forage-based diet might have 300 or more milligrams per 3-6-ounce serving. The same is true for the other trace minerals such as copper, manganese, and selenium. Similarities exist in the amounts of various vitamins, as well, with both product types tending to provide somewhere between 500-1,000 IU of vitamin E per serving. I understand why the serving sizes being so different, because clearly the difference can’t be explained by these nutrients. Differences become apparent when looking at amounts of macrominerals, such as calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, and sodium. One vitamin mineral supplement guarantees a minimum of 8% calcium and 4% phosphorus. With a serving size of 115 grams, this means each serving provides 9.2 grams of calcium and 4.6 grams of phosphorus. On face value, the amount of calcium in ration balancers looks lower, because it’s typically in the range of 3-4%, while phosphorus is about 1%. But with the larger 1-2-pound serving size, this equates to a possible daily calcium intake of between 13.6 to 36.4 grams and 9 grams of phosphorus.
Daily macromineral requirements are in gram quantities, whereas horses only need trace minerals in milligram quantities. When you have a serving size of up to 2 pounds per day for the ration balancer, manufacturers have a lot more volume in which to add macrominerals. This is especially true when you consider that ingredients aren’t made entirely of the desired nutrient. For example, calcium carbonate is not 100% calcium. In the case of calcium carbonate, just less than 40% is actually calcium, so if 20 grams of calcium from calcium carbonate are needed per serving, the serving must provide 50 grams of calcium carbonate. Adding more macrominerals therefore results in a much larger product serving size
Create a free account with TheHorse.com to view this content.
TheHorse.com is home to thousands of free articles about horse health care. In order to access some of our exclusive free content, you must be signed into TheHorse.com.
Start your free account today!
Already have an account?
and continue reading.
Written by:
Clair Thunes, PhD
Related Articles
Food Allergies, Intolerances, and Sensitivities in Horses
Understanding Mineral Supplementation in Equine Diets
Feeding Horses That Have Dry Skin
Your Guide to an Outrageously Shiny Equine Coat
Stay on top of the most recent Horse Health news with
FREE weekly newsletters from TheHorse.com
Sponsored Content
A Novel Treatment for Equine Osteoarthritis: 2.5% Polyacrylamide Hydrogel
Harnessing Fluorescent Light Energy for Horse Wounds and Skin Disease
PulseVet Shock Wave Therapy for Horses
Weekly Poll
Readers’ Most Popular
Top Categories