Faulty Tack Revisited

Share
Favorite
Please login to bookmarkClose
Please login

No account yet? Register

ADVERTISEMENT

If you don’t like the weather in Kentucky, an old saying goes, wait a few minutes and it will change. The same often is true for court decisions. If you think one court got it wrong, there probably will be another decision from a different court that reaches an opposite conclusion.

A few months ago, I shared an appellate decision in Maine that expanded the conventional idea of “faulty tack” to include a functional, working-order saddle that might have been used in an improper manner. The case involved a child who was injured when the saddle slipped on a pony she was riding. The court concluded that using a fleece-covered girth on a fat pony with withers that might charitably be called less-than-prominent amounted to providing faulty tack, even though neither the saddle nor the girth nor the cover had any physical defects

Create a free account with TheHorse.com to view this content.

TheHorse.com is home to thousands of free articles about horse health care. In order to access some of our exclusive free content, you must be signed into TheHorse.com.

Start your free account today!

Already have an account?
and continue reading.

Share

Related Articles

Stay on top of the most recent Horse Health news with

FREE weekly newsletters from TheHorse.com

Sponsored Content

Weekly Poll

sponsored by:

In the past 12 months, have you spoken to your farrier about the benefits of nonmetal/synthetic/plastic horse shoes?
128 votes · 128 answers

Readers’ Most Popular

Sign In

Don’t have an account? Register for a FREE account here.

Need to update your account?

You need to be logged in to fill out this form

Create a free account with TheHorse.com!